https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50883
Julien Nabet <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #3 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> 2012-06-08 14:25:49 PDT --- First thank you for your quick and useful feedback ! I tried to reproduce within and without gdb session. Without gdb, I didn't reproduce the problem badfully Within gdb, I had a segfault, eg here the backtrace : Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007f65c582b288 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f65c582b288 in ?? () #1 0x00007f65c57cbdd0 in ?? () #2 0x00007fff00000000 in ?? () #3 0x00007fffea607e98 in ?? () #4 0x00007fffea607e50 in ?? () #5 0x000000000000008b in ?? () #6 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) c But by going on, the macro dialog appears as if segfault hadn't happen. I had the same behaviour with 3.5 branch and master. We need someone (certainly a Windows user) to retrieve a more useful bt. (If you're interested in this subject, there's a great video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fppBTs215yc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
