https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
--- Comment #4 from Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> ---
(In reply to Markus Mohrhard from comment #2)
> ok. The problem here is that one entry that is only used internally is a
> formula entry with 0%. As a result the minimum is the smallest value of the
> range (3.1) which is larger than the upper bound (1) and therefore we ignore
> the rule.
>
> I need to get back into the code to understand why I used this hidden entry
> for the zero entry.
Ah it is even easier. I have a safety check in there that is just wrong and
causes the problem. Removing that check seems to solve the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
