https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956
--- Comment #11 from Alex Thurgood <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #10)
Hi Stephan,
> I'm not sure whether that answers my question. I do understand that, since
> some version of LO (5.1, as you say), LO only supports (Oracle) JDKs, no
> longer any plain (Apple, Oracle) JREs. However, what I'm unsure about is
> whether that change also really caused LO to not even support (Oracle) JDKs
> on old versions of OS X (10,8, 10.9), or whether that's an unproven claim.
> Hence, my question whether anybody can actually confirm that. (I myself
> don't have such an old OS X available.) Can you confirm it?
In bug 94716, comments 14 and 20 confirmed this.
However, I have just tested removing the existing (and now outdated) JDK
version I had on my MBPro OSX 10.9.5 machine, and installed the latest
JDK8_u111. This was automatically detected by LO 5152.
>From comment 26, a second confirmation that the JDK is detected on OSX 10.9.5,
so maybe we should close this now as WFM (I have no idea which, if any, commit
fixed this).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
