https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101252
Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsUXEval |easyHack, needsDevEval
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to lafeuil from comment #7)
> ... I thought it is not very complicated to implement it.
That might be true. But an alphabetical index and an user-defined index that
can be sorted alphabetically adds confusion. In the long term we should come up
with a better/easier solution.
I have to admit that your workflow is still not entirely clear to me. The usual
operation for footnotes is straightforward, so why do you add a ToC there
(shouldn't it be restricted to the current page)?
Anyway, the change is pretty simple and makes sense for the user-defined index,
which has to be as flexible as possible. So I remove the needsUXEval and
suggest to reuse what is there in the alphabetical index.
Easyhack?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
