https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103691
Joel Madero <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[email protected]
--- Comment #4 from Joel Madero <[email protected]> ---
> Well... 'primary information' and 'evil' are quite strong words, are not
> they?
I second this. The word "evil" was a poor choice. It seems like at least having
an option to display errors in color wouldn't harm anyone and could be quite
useful for some. I'm not sure when LibreOffice chose to set the bar behind
gatekeepers for enhancement requests. This is clearly a valid enhancement
request, at least when we used to consider an enhancement request as follows:
Any request that would cleanly fit within the current software and would
benefit some in some case.
Now in this case the request would harm no one (if it were an option) and could
have real benefits for many. Furthermore, it's clear that it fits cleanly
within the current LibreOffice software.
Is there a wiki somewhere that says how enhancements are now being considered?
One or two members of UX reject and it gets closed? The enhancement requester
has to fight tooth and nail to convince people of its value? Just curious, a
wiki would be nice, if nothing else to clarify for users who take the time to
put in requests what is going on when their enhancement requests are being
rejected. Also, if things have changed I suggest going through the several
thousand open enhancement requests and purging most of them because I'm sure
1-2 UX people would feel like they should be purged
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
