https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103791
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] ---
(In reply to carcharot from comment #3)
> (In reply to Joel Madero from comment #1)
> > This is a pretty far fetched idea that is almost definitely never going to
> > be implemented.
> >
> > That being said, it's a valid request (might help a corner case of users)
> > and wouldn't really hurt any user. Moving to NEW.
> >
> > FYI: Enhancements are handled entirely by volunteers. A volunteer with some
> > serious skills and some serious time would have to find this interesting
> > enough to tackle. This is *incredibly unlikely* so I wouldn't hold your
> > breath that it'll ever be implemented.
>
> Thanks for your advice..., it is true what you say about it's implementation
> being unlikely... If I had skills -not necesarily serious, just some skills
> at all, informatikally speaking-, I would do it for me and others, but i
> don't...
> That sayed, and just to ad some more fire to the pyre :P, I think that not
> all org-mode must be implemented..., just a few core functions of org-mode
> would be enough..., and just on LO Writer...
> Let say Scheduling-Deathlines, tags, hierarchical-indentation of headlines,
> with its sistem of moving up and down as a block with its deppendencies,
> some hot-keys here and there, and a limited agenda-view not even interactive
> mounted on the previously referred alternatives...
> I know it is a lot of work, but it also would very likely be used by a lot
> of people, I think... (everybody that works has a to-do system
> implemented...).
> Thanks again,
> Carcharot.
I wish to erase this, but do not know how...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
