https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53027
--- Comment #26 from Alex Thurgood <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #21)
> It's been like this since initial import in 2000!
> I must recognize I don't understand why using a function about odbc (or
> which indicates it's about odbc) whereas we're not in odbc part.
I imagine that the thinking at the time was to produce ODBC-compliant strings ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
