https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104694

Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needsDevAdvice              |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG

--- Comment #7 from Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> ---
OK, Tor gave it some thought on IRC and I think this can be closed as harmless.
I am including the comments below.

Those registry value lookups where that BUFFER OVERFLOW is reported are not
from LO code, I think 

I don't see we would look up MachinePreferredUILanguages or
PreferredUILanguages, for instance 

I'd say it's a red herring

isn't the normal way to retrieve some data of unknown length, in the Win32 API,
to first retrieve it using some small buffer, get an error *and* information
how large buffer is needed, and then ask again? 

as far as I can guess, that is exactly what is going on here 

because after each "BUFFER OVERFLOW", is a new attempt to get the same data 
at least many of the cases

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to