https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104694
Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsDevAdvice |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--- Comment #7 from Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> ---
OK, Tor gave it some thought on IRC and I think this can be closed as harmless.
I am including the comments below.
Those registry value lookups where that BUFFER OVERFLOW is reported are not
from LO code, I think
I don't see we would look up MachinePreferredUILanguages or
PreferredUILanguages, for instance
I'd say it's a red herring
isn't the normal way to retrieve some data of unknown length, in the Win32 API,
to first retrieve it using some small buffer, get an error *and* information
how large buffer is needed, and then ask again?
as far as I can guess, that is exactly what is going on here
because after each "BUFFER OVERFLOW", is a new attempt to get the same data
at least many of the cases
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
