https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100137

oia...@gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|NOTABUG                     |NOTOURBUG

--- Comment #39 from oia...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Martin Nathansen from comment #35)
> > 
> > Closing as NOTABUG for the *final time*. I hope I don't have to ban anyone
> > for reopening this again.
> 
> Buovjaga, why did you close my bug report? I do not file bug reports just
> for fun, and as you can take from the discussion above there is really a bug
> which needs to be fixed!
> What is you intention behind banning people from the LO project who invest a
> lot of time and energy to  improve LibreOffice?

(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #34)
> (In reply to oiaohm from comment #33)
> > This is why I reopened this bug.  If someone in the Technical Committee is
> > watching they could take over this bug until ruling is got resulting in
> > planned alteration to standard that could be just confirming current
> > behaviour.
> > 
> > Now to get ruling you need to provide why this means I do at times need an
> > open bug.   So I really cannot submit up to OASIS for ruling if the bug here
> > is going to closed since I need this for why ruling is required on the
> > hyperlink one.
> 
> Then open the issue in the OASIS issue tracker:
> https://issues.oasis-open.org/
> 
> Closing as NOTABUG for the *final time*. I hope I don't have to ban anyone
> for reopening this again.


Only member of the TC can in fact open issues on the OASIS issue tracker
https://issues.oasis-open.org/.

This is the problem this bug need to go to someone who has access rights to TC
to submit the issue to on the OASIS issue tracker to be resolved at that level.
 To make sure that Libreoffice and everything else ODF handles symlink case the
same way.

There will be the odd bug like this one where what is required is a TC member
to push the issue up the next level.

Now if Buovjaga you have TC access and can submit the issue in the OASIS issue
tracker to clearly define how ODF programs should react in case of symlink and
had put a link here to that request I would have left this closed in the first
place and corrected the status.  Then the bug in the standard has been transfer
from Libreoffice bug list to the standard issue list.

My point of view the required step to close the bug properly and make sure of
ODF to ODF application compatibility requires this fault opened on the OASIS
issue tracker by some means. 

There have been a few bugs closed like this that should have been transferred
to standard body.

At this stage using symlinks is undefined behaviour.   So if someone submitted
a patch that resulted in Libreoffice not opening symlinks due to limiting to
only ODF define behaviour it would be valid.

Buovjaga please read you closed options.   There is a NOTOURBUG option.

Is what going on a bug in Libreoffice the answer is no.   Is this a issue that
the standard does not cover a case and Libreoffice is doing something undefined
that could be wrong the answer is yes.   So this is someone elses bug being the
standards bug. 

So if you were correct closing this bug the closed is.  CLOSED, NOTOURBUG.

You cannot tell someone to report else where and closed bug with NOTABUG.  
NOTABUG means is not a bug for libreoffice or for the standard or anything
else.

Part of the reason I reopened was NOTABUG close tag is complete wrong for this
type of bug.   Since you say you will ban me if I reopen I will just correct
the closing status as you should have got right in the first place.

Reality is closed with NOTABUG means I should not be raising the issue else
where.    As so you give directions to report else where remember that means
the bug is NOTOURBUG.   I would recommend Buovjaga that you check the bugs you
have closed with NOTABUG and make sure there are not more that you have failed
to use NOTOURBUG tag when you should have.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to