https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51239
--- Comment #21 from Michael Meeks <[email protected]> 2012-07-11 11:30:55 PDT --- Hi Alex, the profiler report looks rather interesting (thanks so much for trying all these tools at LibreOffice !). Having said that - its' hard for me to see where the profiler thinks most of the time has gone ... is there any %age estimation / call-count or absolute time measurement in there to use ? I just saw traces. sberg - IIRC Lionel is fairly convinced this is a Java stack-guard slowness, and I guess we're hoping to have that ruled out before digging much further. I believe we fixed that - right ? There is a whole lot of: 1 uno_Environment_invoke (in libuno_cppu.dylib.3) + 37 [0x2d3c7f] + ! : | + : 1 uno_Environment_invoke_v (in libuno_cppu.dylib.3) + 28 [0x2d3c58] + ! : | + : 1 uno_Environment_enter (in libuno_cppu.dylib.3) + 326 [0x2d3c1c] + ! : | + : 1 uno_EnvDcp_getPurpose (in libuno_cppu.dylib.3) + 4215 [0x2d2dee] + ! : | + : 1 uno_Environment_invoke (in libuno_cppu.dylib.3) + 155 [0x2d3cf5] + ! : | + : 1 uno_initEnvironment (in libaffine_uno_uno.dylib) + 903 [0x1ebdd417] (assuming the symbols are remotely reasonable). Is it possible that there is some horrible leak / performance problem / re-marshalling in the inter-apartment code ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
