https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105983
--- Comment #7 from Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk> ---
It seems this signature still has a small problem,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4050#section-3.3 says ECDSA signature value
should be just the (r,s) pair as-is (with base64 encoding), while the sample
applies the ASN1 encoding suggested by
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3279#section-2.2.3 -- which is an earlier RFC +
applies in general, not in particular to xmldsig.
The result is that xmlsec refuses to verify the signature currently.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
