https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106588
--- Comment #6 from Terrence Enger <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 132238
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=132238&action=edit
details of bibisect in daily Linux dbgutil repository
I ran some tests with the daily Linux dbgutil bibisect repository on
debian-stretch. As I see neither the slowness that Alex reported in
comment 3 nor the fastness that he reported in comment 2, I suspect
that the bibisect results in this environment are not worth much, and
I am leaving keyword bibisectRequest.
Anyway, here are the results of my reverse bibisect (good means slow,
bad means faster) ...
commit date s-h SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN: (elapsed,CPU secs)
-------- ---------- -------- -------------------------------------
good 6f431dc2 2017-01-27 2be42d94 gen : (31,30.43); gtk3 : (44,34.06)
bad 44f8a607 2017-01-28 41323222 gen : (23,22.41); gtk3 : (29,23.54)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
