https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107033
Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |bibisected, bisected,
| |regression
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |[email protected],
| |[email protected]
Ever confirmed|0 |1
OS|Linux (All) |All
--- Comment #1 from Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> ---
Regression introduced by:
author Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> 2013-09-04 14:08:49 (GMT)
committer Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> 2013-09-04 14:44:51
(GMT)
commit 330b860205c7ba69dd6603f65324d0f89ad9cd5f (patch)
tree 39f845453bbf0c1cb6d2b7f0d7f95860b1a3f226
parent dc86610d16a561ff1a0455d5fef157431f9271e3 (diff)
fdo#68787 DOCX import: handle when w:separator is missing for footnotes
There were two problems here:
1) OOXML has no way to explicitly disable the footnote separator, what
is does is that it omits the <w:separator/> element in that case. We
didn't parse that previously -- now we do, and if it's missing, the
separator is disabled.
2) The footnote stream isn't read by the importer, only when the main
stream references the footnote one, the relevant part of it is parsed.
At the moment we always parse the first (special, "separator") entry in
the footnote stream, that may be optimized later if it becomes a
bottleneck.
Bisected with bibisect-42max
Adding Cc: to Miklos Vajna
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
