https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107459
m.a.riosv <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from m.a.riosv <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #4)
>..............
>
For me, if it is not explicit, it's not explicit, and I can't interpreter as I
like.
Even I think I understand your interpretation, that sounds reasonable.
> Is there a draft for a next version of odf (recalc) concerning this?
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=51469&wg_abbrev=office-collab
In any case testing with a inner array gives what seems an erroneous result
=MATCH(5;{20;19;18;17;16;15;14;13;12;11;10;6;6;5;5;4;4;3;2;1};-1) = 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20
If I'm not wrong result should be 15 as happens with an unmodified address
array.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
