https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52240
Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> 2012-07-19 19:10:15 PDT --- <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage#Process> item 5 Results of a first quick test: Currently I can't see anything what I would really call a bug. But the interpreter is very picky: for formatting '"YYYY-MM-DD" an input "MM-DD" will not be accepted. That might be correct, I am not sure whether "MM-DD" is a date confirming to German standards (I used German loc. for that test). Exactly following the selected date formatting with the input will be accepted as a date. We will have to distinguish: a) does the date recognition work correct? My quick test seems to say "yes", I did not find a real "bug" b) is that already optimum useful? I do not thing so. A cell formatted "YY-MM-DD" should accept an input "12-31" and complete it to date "12-12-31" @Eike: Is there already a test proceeding for such us-advise fine tuning? If not, we will have to create sample documents (for all localizations) with examples where practical work might need exceptions from total correctness in favor of usability? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
