https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107500
Terrence Enger <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected
--- Comment #9 from Terrence Enger <[email protected]> ---
Working on debian-stretch in the daily Linux dbgutil bibisect
repository, I see that the bug started somewhere in the 8 commits ...
commit date s-h
-------- ---------- --------
good 8b7f5c9c 2017-04-27 437105b9
bad b8d9ccca 2017-04-28 74ccd02e
For this work, I deemed the version bad equally whether the sans-serif
font shows on the first or on the second data-to-fields.
I am removing keyword bibisectRequest and adding bibisected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
