https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39168
--- Comment #10 from [email protected] 2012-07-26 13:42:59 PDT --- Thank you that you want to take this enhancement proposal and patch to the UX mailing list. As I explained in the developer mailing list a while ago and also in then comments to this bug, I think that .odt.pdf would be the (only) way to identify that the user deals with a hybrid pdf. Everything else makes the HybridPDF function a "hidden treasure" and the lack of any indication of HybridPDFs annoys in this regard that one tries to import non-hybrid PDFs into LibreOffice, which is a pain. The original idea of HybridPDF was taken from the programme Papyrus and they use .pap.pdf for quite some while. So why not doing the same? As I wrote in the the description of this bug: After implementing "clear and useful file extensions", the ideal world could also have some form of operating system integration, like "Open With LibreOffice". In any case, thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
