https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108820
Yousuf Philips (jay) <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |[email protected],
| |[email protected],
| |[email protected],
| |[email protected]
Blocks| |103100
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Yousuf Philips (jay) <[email protected]> ---
Looks like a bug to me as the footnote grey highlight does appear in the
repeated table header and the footnote appears in both places in Word 2010. So
lets set to NEW for the time being.
But in Word 2010, the comment that was added to repeated table header also
appears in the original table header, so not sure how independent each repeated
table header should be. So lets ask some expert.
Regina, Cor, Stuart: What is your take?
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #6)
> So I added the keyword needsUXEval. So I hope that someone else can assess,
> whether this is a bug or not.
Only adding the keyword wont get Heiko to notice, as you need to also add the
ux-advise email to the CC list as well. Luckily you added a meta bug, which is
how i noticed. :D
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
[Bug 103100] [META] Writer table bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
