https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96370
--- Comment #11 from Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr> ---
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated yesterday, I could reproduce
this.
Just for information, it works if I do this:
diff --git a/dbaccess/source/core/api/RowSet.cxx
b/dbaccess/source/core/api/RowSet.cxx
index 68da787a81dc..43fbd979235c 100644
--- a/dbaccess/source/core/api/RowSet.cxx
+++ b/dbaccess/source/core/api/RowSet.cxx
@@ -2320,9 +2320,8 @@ void ORowSet::impl_initComposer_throw( OUString&
_out_rCommandToExecute )
m_xComposer->setCommand( m_aCommand,m_nCommandType );
m_aActiveCommand = m_xComposer->getQuery();
-
- m_xComposer->setFilter( m_bApplyFilter ? m_aFilter : OUString() );
- m_xComposer->setHavingClause( m_bApplyFilter ? m_aHavingClause :
OUString() );
+ // m_xComposer->setFilter( m_bApplyFilter ? m_aFilter : OUString() );
+ m_xComposer->setHavingClause( m_bApplyFilter ? m_aFilter : OUString() );
if ( m_bIgnoreResult )
{ // append a "0=1" filter
Of course, it's just for the test, not a fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
