https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111811
--- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Jäger <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #9)
> (In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #8)
> > But: If the names of services and interfaces also are "subject to change"
> > under something like the above quoted statement by Stephan Bergmann, how
> > should someone write long-term-reliable code ("3rd-party") for special
> > requirements or for a distributable extension?
> Just to clarify: Names of services and interfaces are not "subject to
> change", only implementation names are. ...
Thank you very much. This clarifies the situation for me.
I didn't know a specification to that effect. However, what I need to know are
the services. And in by far the most cases I tested for service support. Then
there was an exception...
> ... That is, checking with
> supportsService is the right thing to do, and is what was guaranteed to stay
> compatible across versions.
Would you mind to tell me where the "guarantee" is given?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
