https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94363
--- Comment #7 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Tom from comment #6)
> Bugzilla used by the Document Foundation is an effective tool to
> systematically report and track all issues of LO. I understand that
> especially the users of LO are responsible to clearly report any new issue
> so that it can be reproduced and fixed by the development team. Likewise, I
> expect the development team to be responsible to comment any issue that has
> been discarded or fixed and close these issues afterwards. However, a 25%
> rate of silently fixed issues suggests that the second part of the tracking
> process is not as effective as one would expect. I think, rather than asking
> the original reporters of any open issue that is older than a year to check,
> if the corresponding issue was resolved (by chance), it would be better to
> find out, why a significant rate of resolved issues is not tracked (i.e. is
> silently fixed). Given the root cause of this significant rate, there is the
> chance to make the entire bug tracking process more efficient.
What you are describing is the responsibility of the QA team, which consists
mostly of volunteers. A QA team member does not need to know one bit of C++.
You can learn more about what we do by examining this resource:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
