https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113705
Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> ---
09:56 < ricotz> hello, how is this not an upstream problem
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113705 ? of
course this is building with icu 60.1 which isn't officially
used by upstream yet
09:56 < IZBot> bug 113705: LibreOffice-framework normal/medium RESOLVED NOTABUG
linebreak unit test failure when building against libicu 60.1
09:57 < ricotz> _rene_, hi, fyi ^
09:57 < tml_> but the resolution says it *is* an upstream problem
09:58 < tml_> in icu upstream, that is
09:58 < loircbot> LibreOffice (core) caolanm *
vcl/unx/generic/gdi/cairotextrender.cxx: ofz speed up fuzzers
a tad
09:59 < _rene_> tml_: why should it?
09:59 < ricotz> tml_, I assumed this is some behaviour change which libreoffice
would need to adapt to
09:59 < _rene_> exactly
09:59 < tml_> or is there something sacred with the ICU software that they can
never have bugs, and any regressions in their behavioiur is
always the fault of their clients?
09:59 -!- ohallot [~Thunderbi@179.218.180.46] has joined #libreoffice-dev
09:59 -!- iplaw67 [~Thunderbi@178.73.157.19] has quit [Read error: Connection
reset by peer]
10:00 < ricotz> tml_, this has to be determined without closing this bug
prematurely imo
10:00 < _rene_> tml_: you don't know. but the NOTABUG based on x1sc0 s comment
is simply wrong
10:00 < _rene_> it mnight be a ICU change LO needs to adapt to, yes
10:00 < _rene_> like the changes in 59 etc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
