https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113604
--- Comment #4 from Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> How is this function expected to work regarding constraints. I mean col A
> and B are defined as style:use-optimal-column-width so one of the two has to
> give room when both grow. What happens when I enter a lot of text, or have
> just one character? Without a (adjustable) minimum and maximum the feature
> makes not much sense.
I don't know. The spec has no rule for it. The text of section 20.383 is:
The style:use-optimal-column-width attribute specifies that a column width
should be recalculated automatically if content in the column changes.
The defined values for the style:use-optimal-column-width attribute are:
• false: column width should not be recalculated automatically if content
in the column changes.
• true: column width should be recalculated automatically if content in the
column changes.
The current behavior in UI in LibreOffice is to adjust the total width of the
table; and in case the total width would have to be enlarged but that is not
possible, the command is ignored.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
