https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114508
--- Comment #14 from Telesto <[email protected]> ---
> > That's why I would prefer the ability to save the recovered files to a
> > 'save' location before opening..
> Looks like a new bug. I think that shouldn't be discussed here.
YES and NO. The matter isn't well-thought-out, in my opinion. It started with a
confusing dialog (I agree). The solution is a new design, changing the recovery
behaviour. I'm not totally convinced about that. Do we really want to select
individual files?
I'm missing a proper argument for such change. What do we want to achieve? What
does the user want?
Normally I would expect full recovery of all my open documents (if everything
works as expect). I only want to select individual documents under exceptional
cases:
* Not interested in all the files.
* A crashing file is included in the recovery dialog
Most problematic is a failing recovery, which makes LibreOffice crash again.
This needs a more robust implementation (in my opinion).
A main cause of a crash loop is - in my experience; (I'm I wrong here?) - the
immediate file opening of all the recovered files after recovery. That why a
proposed a change into the recovery proces itself. Between recovery and file
opening. There needs to be a way to recover most of the files safely & identify
the crash culprit without going into the recovery process over and over. The
possibility to open recovered files incrementally and marking the crashy
culprit as bad (or something like that). That's why I ask to have the to 'save'
the recovery files before opening. It's the way how I would handle it manually.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
