https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #58 from ikjt <[email protected]> ---
> (Compared to how the Thin vs ExraLight styles actually look, I think it's an
> exaggeration from the font creators to give the Thin style the width value
> -0.7, as it is not really that much condensed, if at all?)
Using https://opentype.js.org/font-inspector.html and looking at the "OS/2 and
Windows Metrics table", I get the following values:
Overpass Light weight 300, width 5
Overpass ExtraLight weight 200, width 5
Overpass Thin weight 100, width 5
But according to Apple's documentation, macOS does not use the OS/2 metrics
table. So do the font files contain a second set of metadata somewhere that is
wrong, or is CoreText making things up?
Also, I just noticed that, for me at least, the Extra Light weight is missing
from the LO UI. To summarize, Light and Thin are listed but rendered
identically, while Extra Light is missing completely.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
