https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117492
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |[email protected],
| |[email protected]
Blocks| |113117
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
But wouldn't it make the MSI packaging we do more brittle?
Currently we validate -> uninstall -> install -> finalize, and change would be
validate -> install -> finalize -> uninstall.
Current package sequence is good in general and has served us well--with only a
"rare" occasion that the MS Installer balks (for what ever reason) for a user.
Isn't that good enough, just continue to _do_ the removal without an obligation
to roll back a failed install?
And to "just run the install again as Administrator" for those that error out.
We should not pretend to be a Windows only development project, nor adopt
practices geared to programs that are. We already diverge with our
Multi-language MSI (and our language strings longer than 254 characters) as in
bug 45750. Or the UI_LANGS command line flag bug 54585.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113117
[Bug 113117] [META] Windows installer/uninstaller bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs