https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117428
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58
| |941
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
I don't believe Khaled has volunteered to tackle the needed refactoring to the
PDF export filter and GUI. Check History--clearly not assigned as Khaled
removed himself, back to NEW
Otherwise, is there any objection that implementing an /ActualText flag "per
word" will mean string selection to copy from PDF will be limited to word
bounds? Personally I think we need the tagging more than the partial string
copy.
Assuring correct handling combining glyphs and Unicode script--and presumably
OTF font features when implemented (as for bug 58941)--is the desired outcome.
Justified from a11y perspective, and needed for accuracy supporting CTL
scripts.
Is that the UX consensus?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
