https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117824
Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |bibisected, bisected,
| |regression
Priority|medium |highest
CC| |[email protected],
| |[email protected]
Severity|normal |critical
--- Comment #2 from Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> ---
Regression introduced by:
author Caolán McNamara <[email protected]> 2018-04-07 20:24:40 +0100
committer Caolán McNamara <[email protected]> 2018-04-09 11:03:37
+0200
commit 91bb474cc5342b32dab6c701a1bea6c49b87f498 (patch)
tree 959797bef23b50b4f653d3579909ff20162a89ed
parent 06d8e6264487e3084b583e5158d9b89f8480b3eb (diff)
forcepoint#37 revert tdf#108572 let remove storage element
reverts
commit 26957fc325c27cf61e8ef5555b380d627def4931
Date: Wed Sep 6 10:54:50 2017 +0200
tdf#108572 let remove storage element
void OStorage_Impl::RemoveElement( SotElement_Impl* pElement )
expects that m_pAntiImpl will be nullptr, if not throws an exception.
This caused that in case of deleting embedded database used for
mail merge it wasn't fully removed and
The problem is that by allowing the removal of the element, existing readonly
accessors are left pointing to the deleted element which causes quite some
problems
as seen in this sample document
Bisected with: bibisect-linux64-6.1
Adding Cc: to Caolán McNamara
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
