https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114549
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[email protected],
| |[email protected],
| |[email protected],
| |[email protected]
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 |
|6876 |
Blocks| |117936
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
Issue as in OP on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with
Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64)
Build ID: 9b0d9b32d5dcda91d2f1a96dc04c645c450872bf
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL;
Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: group
Testing with font selection of Arial Unicode MS (so coverage of CJK in BMP)
But with current master
Version: 6.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: abb19edc79bd7d96827214d3b49f80e270e1c0b7
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-06-06_17:02:23
Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: group threaded
With
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=fa17a6021f79374ba0e4e010587fa01774805da5
the Hexadecimal field search works now for non-CJK Unicode subsets and a glyph
is shown.
What is weird is that you can enter FEFC (or decimal 65276) and show "ARABIC
LIGATURE LAM WITH ALEF FINAL FORM" from Arabic Presentation Forms-B, but moving
into the Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms and entering FF01 in the Hex field--the
dialog returns missing glyph rather than FULLWIDTH EXCLAMATION MARK. A glyph
which is shown in a cell on the font grid and that can be selected/inserted.
Other CJK glyphs in the font, and present on the grid of Arial Unicode MS, also
show "Missing Glyph" when entered by Hex or Decimal value. Yet they can be
selected/inserted from the grid with scroll and mouse click.
Also, when a CJK glyph is selected from the grid, there is no corresponding
Unicode subset, e.g. selecting F9D1 does not show "CJK compatability
Idiographs" subset. While I tried toggling on CJK language support--but that
does not seem to affect things.
Neither OpenGL nor Default rendering changes result.
Is mishandling Unicode script ID another facet of the CommonSalLayout font
handling regression--bug 117936 so we get the new "Missing Glyph" label.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117936
[Bug 117936] [META] Refactor CommonSalLayout font handling regressions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
