https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118242

Xisco FaulĂ­ <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected],
                   |                            |[email protected]
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
                   |                            |7805
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |bibisected, bisected,
                   |                            |filter:docx, regression
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Xisco FaulĂ­ <[email protected]> ---
Wow, that was a fast catch!

Regression introduced by:

author  Miklos Vajna <[email protected]>  2018-06-18 21:06:30 +0200
committer       Miklos Vajna <[email protected]>  2018-06-19 09:02:59
+0200
commit  853350787df9a8d92c269ef1b6e764863e74ec2a (patch)
tree    e6a25de0428e94b7ea4fa46d7c202d65e947b92f
parent  3a8375eb974eb8ba36ac616478acd881b70f8e19 (diff)
tdf#117805 DOCX export: fix lost header with at-page anchored frames
The bug has two parts: on one hand, the header was not completely lost,
just was written inside a shape. This is not valid, but at least our own
import understood that. This commit restores that old behavior, focusing
on just the regression part of the bugreport.

On the other hand the exported header is still referenced at an
incorrect location: the correct location would be the end of the
document. But that is follow-up work, it seems that never worked.

Bisected with: bibisect-linux64-6.2

Adding Cc: to Miklos Vajna

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to