https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69479
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Blocks| |108253
CC| |[email protected]
--- Comment #18 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Stanislav Horacek from comment #14)
> I tested this with the same setup as bug reporters had: semicolon as the
> separator and incorrectly used commas in formula. (There was a change from
> comma to semicolon in the default separator between 3.6 and 4.0, so it might
> be related to the regression.)
I was going to bibisect this, but I do not reproduce the appearing of zeroes,
when I do it from scratch. Also, I can delete the extra zero from the example
file in any version.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108253
[Bug 108253] [META] Calc cell formula bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
