https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117647
Markus Mohrhard <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Markus Mohrhard <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> Yes, the condition is unclear with the text as it doesn't states any need to
> enter a value. And the limitation to 10 is actually wrong as you can have
> less or more items. So we should do what Kompilainenn suggest. Plus, the
> field should be filled with a default value, e.g. 5, to have some effect
> when setting this option. And ideally the value is implemented as a
> constrained numerical edit for values above 0. Is that feasible, Timur?
>
> The function is not well documented, so CC'ing Olivier. And Sophie for
> l10n/i18n.
These names come directly from Excel and where selected to make the behavior
more consistent with the Excel UI, see e.g.
https://exceljet.net/lessons/how-to-highlight-top-and-bottom-values
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
