https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81522
Justin L <jl...@mail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jl...@mail.com
--- Comment #10 from Justin L <jl...@mail.com> ---
Created attachment 144104
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=144104&action=edit
Demo-Hayden-Management-minimal.docx : reduced to chart and footer
confirmed that the LO 4.2 commit identified in comment 4 matches my own
bibisect using the minimal example.
However, this is also the first time the OLE object shows up as well, so before
there was nothing to "delete" since the document was empty. So not really a
regression, just exposing another bug (unless simply handling the OLE object
was done improperly).
Note that simply deleting the chart itself allows the save to occur. Something
else needs to be deleted (?afterwards?) to trigger the error.
debugging output produces the following after the footer is also deleted.
warn:chart2:25477:25477:chart2/source/tools/LifeTime.cxx:122: This component is
already disposed
warn:svl.items:25477:25477:svl/source/items/itempool.cxx:398: old secondary
pool: EditEngineItemPool of pool: XOutdevItemPool must be empty.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
