https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117994
--- Comment #9 from Justin L <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #8)
> I found some regressions introduced
> by 091aedc63de2f6c8f0f4c60dd1fa93fe4c6ddde4. What should I do with them?
Add a few examples to this document, especially if the problem manifests itself
in a different way.
> What is the reason behind pushing a patch that will be reverted one month
> later? IMHO, this shouldn't have been done unless there is a good reason to
> do so...
This area is extremely dangerous to work in (as evidenced by Caolan ignoring an
old regression that accumulated tons of varied examples), so although the fix
seemed good on all the documents I tested, and passed existing unit tests, I
don't trust it. Plus, once it is reverted, it will provide examples of things
it fixed, but are now "broken" again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
