https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42905

Julien Nabet <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #11 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to robert from comment #10)
> The third steps works as expected for creating an AutoValue. It will work
> with internal HSQLDB and also with internal Firebird. Tested with LO 6.1.1.2
> on OpenSUSE.
Indeed! I just tested this, it worked!

> We should remove the creating of an AutoValue in the second step, where also
> fields will be defined. You could add there a field like ID for
> INTEGER-values and could create the primary key in the third step and set it
> as AutoValue. 
Even more simplification than 3rd, I like this!

> Input of an autoincrement-statement is nothing for database-beginners. Who
> would know it? The wizard, I think, is created for these persons.
Agree with this.

Is everyone ok to remove the AutoValue (from second step) +
autoincrement-statement fields?
Or rather is someone against it and why? Perhaps I'm a bit too quick and it'd
need some UX debate?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to