https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99571
--- Comment #15 from Justin L <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Luke from comment #14)
> As you can see from this example, all of these other content controls are
> not only imported, but they are also functional.
Luke, you didn't try to do anything special to the items in your example. I can
break almost every one of them.
1.) Rich text control: set as "do not allow content modification". In LO, this
is just plain text and not in any kind of textbox at all. The text can be
modified. So really this control is not at all imported nor functional.
2.) Plain text control: set a title. In LO there is no title that appears when
you click in the text.
3.) Image: set "contents cannot be edited." It can be edited in LO because it
is just an image, and not even the Protect:Contents/Position/Size options have
been set in LO.
4.) Choose an item.: Change the color and size of the text. In LO those
settings are ignored. Plus, in Word there is no border/dropdown showing until
you click on the control. That is because in Word this is just text until you
click in the "area" of the control, and then it becomes something special.
6.) Empty Date picker: In Word we see "Click or tap to enter a date" and in LO
we see an ugly, empty box.
But I guess your main point is that the other items choose functionality over
beauty, so why not do the same for the checkboxes? Well, that's one reason why
I posted my patch - anyone who wants to take responsibility for the change can
take the code, clean it up, and submit it. :-)
My biggest concern is with the spacing used (to prevent layout regressions),
and I think I covered that OK in my example patch. Probably a good addition
would be to center the control in the available space.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
