https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #18 from Kovács Viktor <kovacs.viktor....@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #17)
> Are 'hu-Hung' and 'ohu' synonyms, and 'ohu' (Old Hungarian) has implicit
> 'Hung' (Hungarian Runic) script? Or wouldn't it rather have to be an
> explicit 'ohu-Hung'? The IANA language tag registration doesn't mention
> Suppress-Script: Hung, so it would have to be 'ohu-Hung'.
>
> Is 'ohu-Hung' to be preferred over 'hu-Hung'?
I asked ISO639-3 standard registar about Old Hungarian IDs.
I got an answer from the op. Doug Ewell. He wrote:
There is already a BCP 47 script subtag for the Old Hungarian (rovásírás)
script, 'Hung'. There is also a language subtag for the Old Hungarian language,
'ohu'.
These subtags can be combined to create a full BCP 47 language tag, such as
"hu-Hung" for "modern Hungarian written in the Old Hungarian script."
I didn't use word "rovásírás" in my question.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
