https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #29 from Justin L <[email protected]> ---
Coding changes are finished and in master, ready for testing. Minimize icons
have been requested in bug 120300. I'll watch this to make sure that they get
included before 6.2 or else I will remove minimize from icon-only menu
locations. (Note, menu ordering was also changed, so column options
consistently follow row options.)
@Olivier - you can mark this bug as fixed after you update the help for sw.
Suggested wording is in comments 23 and 24, including the two *new* minimize
functions.
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8)
> What is missing, is a true distribution of rows. That requires for the whole
> table (or for a selection cells on multiple rows) the rows are equally
> resized and the existing vertical space is retained, i.e. the table size is
> fixed and the rows (whole table, or within a selection) are distributed
> equally into the existing height.
I think that the optimize function now does what you were looking for. It will
not reduce the table height, but will grow it if necessary since the highest
goal is for all the rows to be equal height. The only difference from
Distribute is that it bases the calculation on the smallest possible size of
the row with the most content, not the row with the greatest physical height
(which could be empty...).
(In reply to what I wrote elsewhere and at which @Cor was snickering about)
> I don't really want to be the one who makes any changes since inevitably
> someone will complain, and optimization is a very subjective concept.
I should be safe here because Minimize Rows/Columns does what Optimize did
before. Wooden shoes, wooden head, wooden listen (not even to himself).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
