https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39595

--- Comment #6 from Bob Kuo <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi Bob - yes, plenty more work is needed :-) in particularly
> make_installer.pl -still- seems very slow (to me) for what it does.
> 
> It seems to spend a ton of time messing around inside .zip archives (very
> slowly) and extracting a load of (big) cruft to /tmp/ while it is making the
> install set that seems (to me) redundant.
> 
> It'd be lovely to try to avoid that - which requires some structural work.
> There are others thinking about / cleaning up and improving that code though
> so perhaps good to poke Tim Retout - who is hacking there.
> 
> Looking forward to your work :-)

Sorry, I thought I was CC'd on this ticket!  I didn't notice these comments
until today.

Can someone tell me the how we invoke make_installer.pl from a fresh git
checkout?  My plan is to have two copies - one unmodified and one that I'll
hack on based on the NYTProf output.  That way I can verify that the files that
are generated are identical to the unmodified script.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to