https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100961
--- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #12)
> I checked what's possible in Word, and it appears Word inserts fixed dates
> as a piece of text, and nothing else. Perhaps it's just an unsupported type
> in DOC formats. However, in that case possibly the old behavior was the
> correct one, which turned fixed dates into a piece of text - the fieldness
> is removed, but the date remains fixed.
Saving a test document to DOCX results in correct roundtrip (wrt this specific
issue that is about const-ness of fields); Word also opens the generated DOCX
with fields in it, having const values. Then, you can save the DOCX to DOC
using Word, and get a DOC with const fields - so the DOC format supports the
const date/time fields. But opening the resulting DOC (generated by Word) using
LO gives non-const date/time fields - so it's at least import filter issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
