https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121945

V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #12)
> so for options to work on... we have:
> 

The OpenOffice era project OOoBib [1] morphed into CSL, but beyond some initial
metadata support in ODF that has not crossed back over to ODF.  Meanwhile CSL
continues to mature and is deeply supported by Zotero & Mendeley.

Would think that rather than reinventing the wheel (editors, schema in our
internal Bibliography DB)--we should concentrate on providing the missing
support for external citation & reference.  

Two tracts to handling--1) a solid framework for 'external' extensions (like
Zotero, Mendeley, even EndNotes) to hang off.

Or, 2) we implement our own native ability to parse CSL and render citation
"objects" (metadata & styling) accordingly.

In either case refactoring the minimal support in of ODF for metadata --(ODF
1.2, 19.757 & 19.758 [2])

=-ref-=
[1] http://www.openoffice.org/bibliographic/
[2]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html#attribute-text_bibliography-type

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to