https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33304
--- Comment #65 from Wolfgang Jäger <j...@psilosoph.de> ---
(In reply to regs from comment #58)
> Why marking not a bug, when all necessary info was provided?
Nobody claimed a lack of information (as far as I can see).
(In reply to regs from comment #59)
> 6. Content moves down, but should keep staying at 1 cm per standard.
Nobody missed reproducibility. Just your statement under "6." is not accepted
by everybody. (Myself among those who reject it.)
(In reply to regs from comment #62)
> But, it's not about opinions. It's about noncompliance to standards. Where all
> other office applications doing it the right way and libre doing it the wrong
> way.
It' s not about opinions? You definitely know what's right and what's wrong?
What standards are you talking of? Who (what institution) approved them?
In what way did you refute my hint concerning a text-body-margin not wide
enough to take a header and its distance from the body? How to handle this
case? As MS Word does? I don't know how it does.
If "all the other office applications" should be entitled to define their
"as-is" standards to also obligate LibO (and its complete family!) I would need
to learn anew what a standard should be.
Changing the behaviour of LibreOffice Writer in a way trying to "fix this bug"
would also cause incompatibilities with Apache OpenOffice and othe descendants
from the common roots.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
