https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123639
--- Comment #7 from ribotb <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Robert Großkopf from comment #4)
> The link in the form is created by you. It mustn't be the same link as the
> link in the relationships. So it wouldn't recognize if you change the
> relationship for the tables and will show the old result. If the field of
> the link in the mainform and in the subform do exist it will show the
> related data. Screenshots doesn't show an erazed link from form to subform.
>
> You have linked, in your example, "IdEdt" of the two tables. You changed the
> value for "editeur" in the table, but the link "IdEdt" is still the same:
> '0' to '0'.
>
> Could be I don't understand where you see the problem - but I can't see a
> bug. The last screenshot of the attachment shows the right result for
> linking "IdEdt".
Hi,
I simply wanted to reproduce and illustrate the process described by
[email protected].
I agree that the relationship in the form - subform is not the relationship
traced in physical data model between tables (Tools > Relationships). And so
the fact of removing the relationship in the physical model of the data has no
effect on the relation established between the form and subform.
And I agree that there is no problem if my process is strictly identical to the
process described by [email protected] in the bug report.
Unless I have not understood what [email protected] was trying to describe...
Bernard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
