https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123752
--- Comment #7 from Jouni Kosonen <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #5)
> Jouni: thanks for your report and investigation. For bisecting, we have
> special repos that contain binaries for commits (or commit ranges in the
> older ones): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect
I see that this issue has already been marked as bisected, so I'll just drop
this here for completeness' sake:
$ git bisect good
9ab19b74662842c303ef72c33f6045cb701ae299 is the first bad commit
commit 9ab19b74662842c303ef72c33f6045cb701ae299
Author: Jenkins Build User <[email protected]>
Date: Sat Dec 1 03:52:19 2018 +0100
source sha:9336286a7ea5385541344f444e6f8702c85bdacb
source sha:9336286a7ea5385541344f444e6f8702c85bdacb
:040000 040000 1c2382d2d7f50dab3c61ab8d29a824698e3c41cc
9070851048d99c2944c6643546ccbc1ff445e357 M instdir
As expected, that source sha is for the commit for the intended fix in
bug 42518 comment 24 mentioned in the original report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
