https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123502
Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de> ---
>From the VS image you can see the release in
fpicker/source/win32/asyncrequests.cxx:83
Just quoting my comment 3 of bug 124039:
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #3)
> So my "lucky" assumption in the fix for bug 122927 is probably wrong. I
> don't have access to a Windows build, and I won't for a longer time. If
> nobody has time to fix this, you should probably revert the fix for bug
> 122927, as this looks like the smaller problem.
>
> A huge hack would be something like
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/69436, which will quite probably work
> correct. Still I think functions should not need to handle locked and
> unlocked calls, which leads to madness IMHO. Locking and multi-threading is
> already hard enough…
Nothing has changed for me.
I'm just setting it to NEW, since the debugger shows the same backtrace as bug
124039.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
