https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112237
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[email protected]
Depends on| |118148
--- Comment #14 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Muhammet Kara from comment #13)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #12)
> > Let's call this implementationError as there is nothing to bibisect
>
> IMO, there is nothing to bibisect, and no implementation error here. Just a
> change of behaviour based on the new design.
>
> Changing to enhancement as per the guidelines on
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/
> Keywords#implementationError
>
> @buovjaga: Please feel free to adjust the bug report further if you think
> this is not appropriate and/or I misunderstood the guideline.
Actually, aren't current issues (i.e. *no* descriptions) from the disconnect of
the <ahelp> tags in NEWHELP as for bug 118148?
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118148
[Bug 118148] [NEWHELP] Handle <ahelp> tags in the UI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
