https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125886

--- Comment #3 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> ---
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #2)
> Created attachment 152164 [details]
> example with footnote height of 14 cm
> 
> I can't confirm it. Looks good with height of 14 cm.
> 
> Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
> Build ID: b170256fb6ebaf774b02b89835b19d9f3a1afb89
> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default; VCL: win; 
> TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-06-07_03:30:35
> Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Language: en-US
> Calc: threaded

Sorry, the report is maybe a little confusing. I intended to demonstrate the
flaw of the default/automatic setting 'Not larger than page area' algorithm.
The automatic distribution of footnotes is far from optimal, IMHO. I would
expect something similar to a manual setting (with a footnote height of 13-15
cm).

So indeed, it looks good with height of 14 cm, but the distribution of
footnotes with 'Not larger than page area' is slightly dubious (in cases with
tables around)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to