--- Comment #3 from Telesto <> ---
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #2)
> Created attachment 152164 [details]
> example with footnote height of 14 cm
> I can't confirm it. Looks good with height of 14 cm.
> Version: (x64)
> Build ID: b170256fb6ebaf774b02b89835b19d9f3a1afb89
> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default; VCL: win; 
> TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-06-07_03:30:35
> Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Language: en-US
> Calc: threaded

Sorry, the report is maybe a little confusing. I intended to demonstrate the
flaw of the default/automatic setting 'Not larger than page area' algorithm.
The automatic distribution of footnotes is far from optimal, IMHO. I would
expect something similar to a manual setting (with a footnote height of 13-15

So indeed, it looks good with height of 14 cm, but the distribution of
footnotes with 'Not larger than page area' is slightly dubious (in cases with
tables around)

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to