https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125837

--- Comment #10 from Markus Elfring <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #8)
> In Data Fields the function is a property of the field, so "sort field names
> separately from the selected computations" does not make sense.

My user interface expectations can be different from the currently available
data model.


> IMHO displaying fields and functions in a two column table may have a benefit 
> of
> a somewhat cleaner layout within that list,

Thanks that you can follow a view in such a direction.


> but might be more confusing in the overall look of the dialog,

I wonder about your concerns about confusion here.


> also because it would leave the impression the two columns of one row
> would be individual items.

How would you get to such an interpretation for the usage of rows?


> Note that the pivot table layout dialog is highly customised with all its
> drag&drop across listbox widgets functionality; changing that probably
> wouldn't just be "choose another widget type".

Would you like to offer switchable data views?


> Drag&Drop should always affect the entire row, both columns, the Data Field 
> Function dialog probably
> be raised with a click anywhere on the row, not just the function column.

I would agree to such an expectation.


(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)

An improved context menu can be combined also with a list and/or table view,
can't it?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to