https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125919
Aron Budea <ba...@caesar.elte.hu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC| |glo...@fbihome.de
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
--- Comment #8 from Aron Budea <ba...@caesar.elte.hu> ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #6)
> https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/
> 4dadbff74eff5f8ad00df99c659f8a2b914e09a1%5E%21
I can confirm the bug was introduced by this commit.
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #7)
> @Aron, the 6.4 bisect repo is ready in
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/admin/projects/bibisect-win64-6.4, could
> you please double check your findings...
Yes, my experience is the same, the bug is gone. The reverse bibisect traced
back the fix to the following commit. Thanks, Jan-Marek!
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=4a478227f5af8322164ecce66fd056e9bf2eac89
author Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de> 2019-06-16 14:19:09
+0000
committer Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de> 2019-06-18 20:27:49
+0200
"VCL cleanup WidgetDrawInterface"
The only question is, considering bug 101086's fix is in 6.3, could the
relevant piece of this commit be identified, and backported to 6.3 as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
