https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126752
Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
|.freedesktop.org |tion.org
Keywords|needsUXEval |
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> ---
We discussed this topic in the design meeting. The implementation requires a
general approach, ie. all autocorrection terms have to handled similarly.
Technically it might be challenging to run the search twice if some string
might have been replaced (for example ' by " where users can undo the
autocorrection so consequently we have to search first for ' and subsequently
for ").
So we suggest to simply show a message that this input might have been
autocorrected. It could be something like "No results found but <foo> might
have been replaced by <bar>." as an enhancement to the current information.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
